• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Book
  • About
    • About the Blog
    • About the Author
  • For Family Caregivers
  • Contact
    • Feedback on Apps and Services

GeriTech

In Search of Technology that Improves Geriatric Care

tech for clinicians

Practical and Prosaic Data Needed by This Doctor

October 16, 2012

Since deciding to delve into the world of healthcare technology and innovation, I’ve repeatedly come across the term “Big Data,” which many claim will be transforming healthcare. As best I can tell, in healthcare terms, Big Data seems to refer to two overlapping ideas. One is that healthcare systems are currently collecting reams of health data, and by analyzing this data, we can identify patterns and signals that we can take action on. The other is that individuals can turn into personal repositories of big data, by frequently measuring various biometric and other parameters (i.e. personal tracking, which leads to the “quantified self”), and then this data can be analyzed and acted upon by the person and healthcare providers.

All well and good, but as with many exciting healthcare tech ideas, I find myself wondering:

“How is this going to help me get the data that I’ve been struggling to get?”

After all, my work requires me to obtain and process a lot of data, namely data regarding a person’s behavior, symptoms, and abilities, and how all of these have changed over time.


Will the Big Data movement help doctors like me?

Here’s a little story to illustrate my data needs in practical terms. Not too long ago, I went on a housecall to see a very elderly man with mild dementia, who lives in a small residential board and care (B&C) facility. The staff there had called the patient’s durable power of attorney (DPOA), saying that the patient, who we’ll call Mr. A., had recently become agitated at night. A urine test had been negative for infection. The B&C staff was wondering if a sedative or other prescription might be indicated. The DPOA had visited the patient and did think he looked less energetic than usual.

“Doctor, what do you think is going on, and what should we do?”

(Actually, people usually just ask the second part of the question, but good medical practice dictates that a clinician should first form a theory of what might be going on, before deciding what to do.)

As many dementia caregivers can tell you, this is a common scenario, and doctors are commonly asked to weigh in and make things better.

The catch is that, to sort out this common situation, one needs data on what has happened. In particular, I needed to know:

  • When exactly did this problem start? Did it start suddenly, or did it come on progressively?
  • Was there an inciting event that can be identified?
  • Is Mr. A distressed at night every night, or just now and then? If now and then, can we identify other factors that fit with the pattern (bowel movements, use of certain medication, etc)?
  • How is his current strength and energy level different from his baseline?

I went to visit the gentleman in question, whom I had never met before. He was very charming and pleasant, but also hard of hearing, and with poor short-term memory. His physical examination did not reveal any obvious cause for the recent concerns. Unsurprisingly, Mr. A. was not able to provide me with the historical data that I needed to make sense of the situation.

So I interviewed the patient’s primary caregiver at the B&C. But here too, the data was hard to obtain. The staffer is Filipino, and although his English seemed ok, he seemed to have difficulty understanding my questions on how Mr. A. seems different now compared to a few weeks ago. He was also inconsistent in his reports of how often specifying how often Mr. A has been having nighttime confusion.

Finally, the caregiver went to find his log book. This facility does not log every resident’s behavior on a daily basis, just “as needed.” We found two entries noting nighttime confusion, the last being a week prior. I left, still uncertain as to just how Mr. A. had changed compared to a month ago. I had just spent over 30 minutes trying to ferret out the data I need for my medical decision-making, and still was not sure I had accurate information to work with.

Given the shortage of geriatricians such as myself, it would obviously be very helpful if technology innovations resulted in my quickly being able access accurate data on a patient’s behaviors and symptoms.

So, will the Big Data movement help a doctor like me? I would say this depends on two key factors:

  • Will emerging technologies facilitate the collection of data relevant to geriatricians? Let’s face it, I don’t currently feel a burning need for a “small, wearable sensor that can capture and transmit blood chemistry data continuously.” What I need is something that reliably logs behaviors and symptoms, as well as medication use. [Update 10/17/12: Since yesterday Sano Intelligence, whose site my link points to, has removed the basic info on their blood chemistry sensor. But I am including a screenshot of the cached site below.]
  • Will Big Data shower doctors with information before we are equipped to triage and act on it? It sounds terrific to send more data to doctors, but we’re currently already suffering from information overload. (I wrote about the trouble with apps sending data to doctors last week.) We first need to develop systems that allow us to act effectively on the information we already have.

The truth is, although I think Big Data offers a lot of potential for population health management, I’m a little worried about how it might play out regarding the care of individual geriatric patients. Each elderly person could certainly generate a significant stream of physiologic, behavioral, and symptomatic data. But often collecting more data from frail elderly patients results in more healthcare, much of which ends up being of uncertain benefit. (Example: more scans usually turns into more things to work up and investigate.)

However, here’s an approach that sounds more manageable to me: a system that would allow doctors such as myself to specify the data to be collected, and that would make this data collection manageable and accurate for patient and caregiver.

In other words, instead of bombarding me with data and telling me to help the patient, what if the patient, the system, and I all first agreed on what information would be useful to gather, and then I received it?

Could I get a nightly confusion monitor for Mr. A please, along with an accurate log of his pain and constipation complaints, a record of medications taken including as-needed medications and over-the-counter drugs, and a daily measure of his physical energy, so I can study his trends and patterns? Please?

10/17/12: Here’s a screenshot of Sano Intelligence’s homepage as it was on 10/10/12, with a little description of the kind of data they could be providing:

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: big data, geriatrics, quantified self, tech for clinicians

Power doctoring (a.k.a. geriatrics) requires power technology

October 1, 2012

Have you noticed that while everyone
has an elderly relative with multiple medical problems, on multiple
medications, and struggling — aka a geriatric patient — many of them have no
idea what a geriatrician is, or how complex is the work we do?
The truth is that we are power users
of doctoring skills, but many seem to be unaware of this.
This past weekend I met an engineer
who works in Silicon Valley with tech start-ups. He is a Yale grad. His father
died last year, after spending nine years in and out of nursing homes. 

He had never heard of a geriatrician
before meeting me. On the other hand, when I described how we help older
complex patients, his face lit up, but then he looked perplexed.
“But why don’t other doctors do
what you do?” he asked me. “And why does health care for older people
suck?”
Well, those are million dollar
questions for sure. (Technically, probably even billion dollar questions given
what health care for older people costs in this country.) Let’s think about a
concise answer to the first question, as I find people ask me this quite a lot.
Right now I usually propose two key
reasons that doctors don’t do what geriatricians do:
1. Lack of geriatric expertise. 
This means both lacking the
knowledge, as well as lacking experience and comfort implementing whatever
geriatric material was taught in med school, residency, or CME course. (I
remember my reluctance to do a mini-mental in residency. Obviously geriatrics fellowship
was a terrific cure for this, as practice makes comfortable, if not always
perfect.)

2. Lack of health technology
tools designed for power use.

Technology tools which help us do
our doctoring faster are great, but how many of them actually work well when
applied to patients as complex as our geriatric patients?

  • Whereas the average primary care
    visit may require reconciling and formulary checking 3-6 medications, we often
    reconcile 8-15 meds. 
  • Whereas the average patient may have
    2-3 other doctors providing medical care, our patients often have 5 or more
    involved. 
  • Whereas the average patient may have
    2-4 chronic diseases requiring ongoing management, our patients often have 6 or
    more.

In my experience, most technologies and tools available to help doctors do their work are not very effective when you are trying to do a lot of whatever it is you need to do. 
Imagine if you used an email program
that allowed you delete mail only one item at a time. This would be ok back in
1995 when you perhaps only received 5 emails per day. Deleting or otherwising
managing them one at a time would be fine. 
But nowadays, almost all
professionals must be power email users, able to manage lots of daily email
quickly, or in batches.
I think health IT for on-the-ground doctors is still in a bit
of a 1995 mode. Very few of the products work well in a power mode. But
providing good care to geriatric patients without spending way too much time
requires power doctoring.
Technologies that support power
doctoring are sorely needed. Those designing healthcare technology tools should
build in the capacity for power use, rather than design just for use on less
complex patients.
This would help geriatricians become
more efficient, and make caring for geriatric patients more manageable for
every doctor.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: tech for clinicians

Introducing GeriTech

September 28, 2012

Hello and welcome to GeriTech. I’m Leslie Kernisan, practicing geriatrician in San Francisco.

I’ve always been interested in how technology can:

  1. Help me with my day-to-day doctoring work, practicing outpatient geriatrics
  2. Help other people – families, caregivers, other health professionals —  provide good health care      to frail and vulnerable elders
  3. Help solve the big problem of how to provide high quality care for an aging population at a price we can all afford.

For the past several years, I practiced primary care geriatrics first at the San Francisco VA, and then for almost two years at a community clinic in Berkeley. In both cases, the technology I used was given to me by the institutions I worked with. This left me with relatively little opportunity to explore or use some newer technologies, such as patient portals, home-based medical monitoring devices, or any of the new-fangled mHealth applications that all the venture capitalists get excited about.

Now, I’m launching a solo geriatric housecalls practice. Here’s what I’ve found myself thinking:

Are there any devices and apps that I should recommend to patients?

[Read more…] about Introducing GeriTech

Filed Under: aging tech, challenges in providing care Tagged With: healthcare technology, tech for clinicians

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

Get the ebook!

Follow @GeriTechBlog

Featured Posts

GeriTech’s Take on AARP’s 4th Health Innovation @50+ LivePitch

My Process for Meaningful Use & Chronic Care Management

Aging in Place Safely: Dr. K vs APS vs the latest start-up

Recent Posts

  • Smartwatches as Medical Alert Devices
  • Putting Older Adults at the Center of Technology Conversations
  • Using Technology to Balance Safety & Autonomy in Dementia
  • Notes from the Aging 2.0 Optimize 2017 Conference
  • Interview: Upcoming Aging 2.0 Optimize Conference & Important Problems in Need of Solutions

Archives

Footer

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at geritech.org

Copyright © 2026 · Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH